Wat is die Stone of Scone?

Wat is die Stone of Scone?


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Alhoewel dit 'n ou teetydgebak klink, is die Stone of Scone 'n ou simbool van Skotse soewereiniteit. Volgens die legende is die sandsteenplaat deur die Bybelse figuur Jacob as 'n kussing gebruik toe hy droom van 'n leer wat hemel toe kom en dan na Egipte, Spanje en Ierland na Skotland gebring word. Die rots, ook bekend as die Stone of Destiny, is eeue lank gebruik tydens die kroning seremonies van Skotse monarge. Na sy oorwinning in die Slag van Dunbar in 1296, het die Engelse koning Edward I die klip van die Scone Abbey van Skotland gegryp en in die voetstuk van 'n spesiaal vervaardigde houtkroningstoel aangebring waarop Engelse - en later Britse - monarge in Londen gekroon is Westminster Abbey sedertdien.

Die Stone of Scone is in die geheim begrawe onder die historiese abdij vir bewaring tydens die Tweede Wêreldoorlog, en 'n plan om dit op te spoor is aan die Kanadese premier gestuur. Duitse bomme het die klip nooit beskadig nie, maar vier studente van die Universiteit van Glasgow wat op Oukersaand in 1950 by Westminster Abbey ingebreek het, wel. Die Stone of Scone van byna 400 pond het in twee verdeel toe die Skotse nasionaliste dit van die Coronation Chair losgemaak het en in die bagasiebak van 'n motor na Skotland teruggebring het. Vier maande nadat dit verdwyn het, is die herstelde klip ontdek gedrapeer in 'n Skotse nasionale vlag op die hoë altaar van die verwoeste Arbroath Abbey. Geen klagte is ooit teen die studente ingedien nie, en die klip is teruggestuur na die Westminster Abbey.

Sewahonderd jaar nadat koning Edward I die Stone of Scone uit Skotse grond verwyder het, het die Britse premier John Major onverwags sy terugkeer aangekondig, wat op 15 November 1996 plaasgevind het. Dit woon nou in die kasteel van Edinburgh, maar sal beskikbaar gestel word vir toekomstige kroning seremonies by Westminster Abbey. Gerugte bestaan ​​egter in Skotland dat die rots wat deur koning Edward I geneem is, 'n replika is en dat die monnike in die Abdij van Scone die werklike klip in 'n rivier weggesteek het of begrawe het vir bewaring.


Skoon

A skons ( / s k ɒ n / of / s k oʊ n /) is 'n gebakte goed, gewoonlik gemaak van koring of hawermout met bakpoeier as rysmiddel, en gebak op plaatpanne. 'N Bolletjie word dikwels effens versoet en soms afgesny met eierwas. [1] Die skons is 'n basiese komponent van die roomtee. Dit verskil van teekoeke en ander soorte lekkers wat met gis gemaak word. Scones is tydens die Oostenrykse voorsitterskap van die Europese Unie in 2006 gekies as die verteenwoordiger van die Republiek van Ierland vir Café Europe, terwyl die Verenigde Koninkryk kortbrood gekies het.


Wat is die Stone of Scone? - GESKIEDENIS

Saamgestel deur Henrik Palmgren | Red-Ice.net


The Stone of Scone, meer algemeen bekend as die Stone of Destiny of die Coronation Stone (alhoewel die voormalige naam soms na Lia F il verwys) is 'n blok sandsteen wat histories gehou is in die nou verwoeste abdij in Scone, naby Perth. Dit staan ​​ook bekend as Jacob's Pillow Stone, Jacob's Pillar Stone en as die Tanist Stone.

Tradisioneel is dit veronderstel om die klip te wees wat Jakob as 'n kussing gebruik het. Dit was oorspronklik veronderstel om gebruik te word as die kroningsteen van die vroeë Dalriada -Skotte toe hulle in Ierland gewoon het. Toe hulle Caledonië binnegeval het, word gesê dat dit vir die gebruik saamgeneem is. 'N Ander teorie verklaar dat die klip eintlik die reisaltaar was wat St Columba in sy sendingaktiwiteite in die hele Skotland gebruik het. Sekerlik, sedert die tyd van Kenneth Mac Alpin omstreeks 847, het Skotse konings tydens hul kroning seremonie op die klip gesit. Op die oomblik was die klip geleë op Scone, 'n paar kilometer noord van Perth.

In 1996 besluit die Britse regering dat die steen in Skotland gehou moet word wanneer dit nie tydens kroning gebruik word nie, en op 15 November 1996, na 'n oorhandigingseremonie aan die grens tussen verteenwoordigers van die binnelandse kantoor en die Skotse kantoor, is dit teruggestuur na Skotland en vervoer na Edinburgh Castle waar dit bly. Alhoewel die klip terug is in Skotland, is Edinburgh Castle die militêre hoofkwartier van die Britse leër in Skotland, en sommige Skotte het aangevoer dat die klip slegs Skots gehou moet word, op 'n plek wat nie as simbolies van die Britse unie geïnterpreteer kan word nie. Daar is voorsiening gemaak om die klip na die Westminster Abbey te vervoer wanneer dit daar benodig word vir toekomstige kroning seremonies.

Jacob se kussingpilaarsteen - die droomsteen van Jacob
Jacob's Pillow-Pillar Stone verwys na 'n episode in die boek Genesis 28: 10-18 [1] toe die Hebreeuse aartsvader Jakob van die huis af hardloop nadat hy die seën van die eersgeborene van sy vader Isak gekry het (en wat sy broer Esau ook wou), kom hy by 'n plek waar hy sy kop op 'n klip laat rus en dit dan heilig nadat God in 'n droom aan hom verskyn het.)

Jakob se Ladder (Bybel)
Toe noem Jakob die plek Bethel (letterlik "Huis van God". "El" is 'n kort vorm van "Elohim"). Die naam "Huis van God" en die term "poort van die hemel" dui op die metafoor van die tempel as die aardse woning van 'n godheid wat dit versterk word deur die beeld in Jakob se droom van 'n leer tussen hemel en aarde wat die engele van God en (volgens die 'langs hom' lees van die teks) gebruik God self om aarde toe te kom.

Waar is die poort van die hemel? - Tower of BabyLon (don)?


Jakob hoor die stem van die Here
. Jakob se ervarings in Charan, waarheen hy gevlug het om te ontsnap aan die toorn van sy broer Esau, wat vir hom kwaad is omdat hy die seën gesteel het (Bereishit 27). Jakob verlaat Beersheba, op pad in ballingskap, stop vir 'n nagrus op 'n plek wat bekend sou staan ​​as "Beit El" (die huis van God) en daar droom hy 'n droom. In sy droom: "Kyk, daar is 'n leer op die aarde, en die kop daarvan bereik die hemel en kyk hoe die engele van God daarop klim en daal" (Bereishit 28:12). Hierna openbaar God homself en belowe hy om Jakob te beskerm waar hy ook al mag reis, om hom die "land waarop jy lê" te gee (vers 13) en selfs 'n menigte nageslag: "Jou nageslag sal wees soos die stof van die aarde en jy sal versprei na die weste, na die ooste na die noorde en na die suide "(Vers 14). Die voortsetting van die vertelling vertel: "En Jakob het uit sy slaap wakker geword en gesê: Waarlik, die Here is op hierdie plek; en ek het dit nie geweet nie. En hy was bang en hy het gesê: Hoe verskriklik is hierdie plek! anders dan die huis van die Here, en dit is die poort van die hemel "(vers 16-17).

Die beskrywing van die hoogte van die leer wat Jakob sien "die hoof daarvan het die hemel bereik", herinner ons aan die beskrywing van die toring van Babel deur sy bouers: "Ons sal 'n stad bou en 'n toring met sy kop na die hemel" (Bereishit 12: 4). Die verhaal van die bou van die toring van Babel is 'n verhaal van menslike trots wat geen perke ken nie. Die mens wil 'n toring bou en vir homself 'n naam maak (ibid vers 4), om die grens tussen hemel en aarde, tussen mens en God, oor te steek. Die straf van die mens kom nie lank nie: God versprei dit op die aarde en verdeel dit volgens hul tale, sodat niemand sy medemens verstaan ​​nie. Die verhaal word afgesluit met 'n Midrash wat spot met die naam Babel: "daarom noem hulle dit Babel omdat God die tale van die aarde balal (verwar)" (vers 9). Hierna sal ons sien hoe die inwoners van Babilon die naam verduidelik van die stad waarin hulle in die Torah gewoon het, dit in elk geval verduidelik in terme van verwarring en vermenging.

In die hele Bybel vind ons geen ander soortgelyke frases as bogenoemde twee nie: "en die kop daarvan [die leer] bereik die hemel" en "'n toring met sy kop na die hemel". Die ooreenkoms tussen die twee frases moet die leser se aandag trek en die twee verhale waarin hulle voorkom, vergelyk. Maar een ding moet onthou word: die leser moet nie tevrede wees met die vind van ooreenkoms nie, maar nog belangriker moet soek na die verskille en selfs onenigheid tussen hulle, aangesien dit eintlik die boodskap kan wees. Die volgende is 'n vergelyking tussen die verhaal van die toring van Babel en die leer van Jakob.

1. Terwyl die toring tussen aarde en hemel verbind, is dit op inisiatief van die mens, maar die openbaring van die leer in Jakob se droom is 'n uitdrukking van God se wil. Die mens bly op aarde, maar as God dit wil, kan die mens getuie wees van 'n openbaring wat tussen hemel en aarde verbind.

2. Die plan van die mens om na die hemel te klim, slaag nie en God stop die bouproses. Daarteenoor verbind die leer wel tussen hemel en aarde en bedieningsengele styg en daal daarop, net soos hulle dit kan en toegelaat word.

3. Om die mens se handewerk, die bou van die toring, te sien, daal God van sy plek af: "En God het neergedaal om die stad en die toring te sien wat die mens gebou het" (12: 5). Toe hy met Jakob praat, staan ​​God bo -aan die leer: “En kyk, die Here het daarbo gestaan ​​en gesê:‘ Ek is die God, die God van Abraham ’(28:13).

4. By die bou van die stad en toring het die bouer van bakstene gebruik gemaak: "en hulle het baksteen vir klip" (11: 3), en dit is moontlik dat ons hier 'n uitdrukking van verbasing - en miskien selfs bespotting - het van diegene wat hulle vertroue in die sterkte en duursaamheid van stene, gemaak deur mensehande. Jakob, daarenteen, plaas 'n regte klip: "En Jakob het die môre vroeg opgestaan ​​en die klip wat hy onder sy kop gesit het, geneem en dit as 'n gedenkteken neergesit" (28:18). Die steen wat Jakob geplaas het, was die fondament van die huis van God wat op daardie plek gevestig sou word: "en hierdie steen wat ek as monument neergesit het, sal die huis van God wees" (ibid 22)

5. In die bouwerk deur die bouers van die toring is daar 'n uitdrukking van uittarting teen die hemel. Jakob se plasing van die klip - en die bou van 'n huis van God op hierdie plek in die toekoms - is om God te eer.

6. Die bouers van die toring begin met hul inisiatief wanneer hulle "uit die ooste reis" (12: 2). Jakob gaan "na die land van die mense van die ooste" (29: 1) nadat hy belowe het om 'n huis van God te stig wanneer hy terugkeer na die huis van sy vader.

7. Die vrees van die toringbouers, "sodat ons nie op die aarde versprei word nie" (12: 4), gebeur wanneer God hulle straf: "En God het hulle op die aarde versprei en van daar af God het hulle op die aarde versprei ”(12: 8-9). God belowe vir Jakob dat hy hom na sy land sal terugbring vanaf die plek van sy ballingskap: "En Ek sal jou na hierdie land terugbring, omdat Ek jou nie in die steek sal laat nie" (29:15).

8. Soos in die verhaal van die toring van Babel, in die verhaal van die leer, word die naam van die plek ook toegelig. In hierdie geval word die naam "Beit-El" (huis van God) in 'n positiewe lig verduidelik, wat God se teenwoordigheid op daardie plek uitdruk: "Hoe vreeslik is hierdie plek! Dit is niemand anders nie as die huis van die Here" (vers 17), "En die plek genoem word Beit El" (vers 19), "en hierdie klip wat ek as 'n monument neergesit het, sal die huis van God wees" (vers 22).

9. En die belangrikste vir ons bespreking: Jakob gaan voort en verklaar dat die plek waar 'n diafragma oopgemaak is om God en sy engele te sien op- en afklim op die leer, die "poort van die hemel" is (vers 18). Dit is 'n duidelike uitdrukking van polemiek teen die Babiloniese uitkyk, wat hul stad so gesien het, aangesien die naam "Babel" deur die Babiloniërs verduidelik is as die "poort van God" (bab-ili) of "die poorte van die gode" "(bab- il? ni), met ander woorde" die poort van die hemel ".

10. Ons verhaal verklaar dat die poort van die hemel gevind word in die land Israel en nie in die land Shen'ar nie, in Beit-El en nie in Babilon nie, 'n plek waar die gelowige danksegging uitgespreek het aan sy God wat aan hom geopenbaar is en nie 'n plek waar die mens God se woonplek wou verower nie. Babilon is nie meer die naam “poort van die hemel” waardig nie, en dit verwys nou na Beit-El.

Die oordrag van die plek van "die poort van die hemel" van Babilon na Beit-El is nie die gevolgtrekking van die proses nie. In die verhaal van die dorsvloer van Arvana, die verhaal van die inwyding van Jerusalem in die dae van Dawid, soos dit in die boek Divrei Hayamim (Kronieke) vertel word, vind ons 'n vers wat geen ooreenkoms het in hoofstuk 24 van Shmuel II, wat die oorspronklike bron is vir die samesteller van Divrei Hayamim: "En Dawid het gesê: Dit is die huis van God en dit is die offeraltaar vir Israel" (Divrei Hayamim I 22: 1). Die fraseologie is baie soortgelyk aan dié van Jakob in die verhaal van die leer ("Dit is niemand anders nie as die huis van die Here en dit is die poort van die hemel" [vers 17]), en dit lyk asof dit 'n poging is om identifiseer verskillende plekke van seremoniële betekenis, Beit-El en Jerusalem, as een plek.

Hierdie idee word later in die Midrash genoem. Daar word vertel dat Jakob na die berg Moria gegaan het en daar gaan slaap het omdat die son ondergegaan het, en hy het skielik wakker geword met groot vrees en gesê: Dit is die huis van die Heilige, salig sy! waar daar gesê is 'dit is die poort van die hemel' ". Nadat Jakob 'n monument opgerig het, "wat doen die Heilige, salig sy? Hy het sy regtervoet stewig neergesit en die klip tot in die dieptes van die aarde gedruk en daarop staan ​​die tempel van God soos dit geskrywe is "en hierdie klip wat ek as 'n monument geplaas het, sal die huis van God wees" (Pirkey D'Rabi Eliezer, hoofstuk 35).

Is die Stone of Scone of Jakob se kussing/pilaarsteen 'n hoeksteen of 'n hoeksteen van Salomo se tempel of uit die toring van Babel/Babilon?

Praat ons van dieselfde klip, die Coronation Stone, wat vroeër in Westminster Abbey, Londen was? Vanwaar die Britse-Israel Wêreldfederasie reël. Is hulle deel van die verlore stamme van Israel, nou onder 'n vaandel van die Verenigde Koninkryk van die hemele?

'N Bladsy: Het dit iets te doen met die The Tower of (Baby) London? (Offeraltaar)

In 'n artikel wat ek gevind het, stel hulle die vraag "Is Londen die nuwe Jerusalem, die stad van Openbaring?":

Die ou heilige plekke in Londen is in 'n baie belangrike patroon geleë
Die skrywer het die afgelope agtien jaar navorsing gedoen oor die verhoudings tussen die oudste heilige plekke in Londen. Hul liggings definieer 'n groot patroon van heilige meetkunde op die landskap: 'n Groot en pragtige ontwerp wat die hele groter Londen dek. Die belangrikste belyning daarvan skakel met ander ou plekke oor die lengte en breedte van die land.

'N Monumentale ontdekking, soos om nog 'n stonehenge onder die Oxford -sirkus te vind
Die basis van hierdie patrone is 'n tempelgrondplan. Dit is die belangrikste konstruksie van heilige meetkunde en dit is deur die eeue heen in die ontwerp van tempels gebruik. Die oudste voorbeeld van die gebruik daarvan is inderdaad in die konstruksie van Stonehenge. Om presies dieselfde ontwerp te vind, maar op 'n baie groter skaal, verborge in die Londense landskap, is op die minste opvallend. Om te vind dat dit gedefinieer word deur sommige van die belangrikste antieke plekke in Londen, Westminster Abbey, St. Paul's Cathedral, The Tower of London en ander te talryk om hier te noem, is 'n verstommende bewys dat hierdie ontdekking 'n vaste grondslag in die werklikheid het.

Is Londen die Nuwe Jerusalem, die Stad van Openbaring?
Die meetkunde van Earthstars is uiters belangrik en bevat 'n harmoniese verhouding met die struktuur en afmetings van die aarde en die maan. Dit is voorheen opgemerk deur nie minder 'n gesag oor hierdie onderwerpe as John Michell wat hierdie geometriese konstruksie ook assosieer met die afmetings en verhoudings wat toegeskryf word aan The City of Revelation, the New Jerusalem, beskryf deur St. John in The book of Revelation. Dit is opmerklik dat dit 'n ongewone bevestiging is van William Blake se visioene van Jerusalem binne die geestelike dimensies van Londen.

Aangesien die stad Openbaring aan die einde van die eeu sou verskyn, is dit miskien geen vertroue dat hierdie ontdekking aan die lig gekom het by die keerpunt van die millenium nie. Dit is eerder kommerwekkend dat omgewingsbewustes ons meer waarsku dat die einde deesdae naby is, eerder as visioenarisse soos St, John of William Blake.

Die verbinding van Rennes Le Chateau
Daar is 'n legende dat die Tempeliers 'n skat gesmokkel het wat hulle onder die Rotskoepel in Jerusalem uitgegrawe het (waar die Salomo -tempel ooit was). Hierdie skat beland uiteindelik in Rennes le Chateau in Suid -Frankryk, met 'n soort verbinding met die Katare (nog 'n verlore stam?).


Ons het gelees oor die stelling 'Hierdie plek is verskriklik' bokant die kerkdeur, 'n aanhaling uit die boek Genesis, spesifiek die verhaal waarin die aartsvader Jakob op 'n klip aan die slaap raak en 'n visioen het van 'n leer wat lei na Hemel, met engele wat opklim en neerdaal daarop. Hierdie klip is dieselfde as die Stone of Destiny wat deur die profeet Jeremia na Skotland gebring is, en dit het die steen geword waarop Britse monarge vandag nog hierheen gekroon word. Wat opvallend is, is dat onder die woorde 'Hierdie plek is verskriklik' op die deur, het ons die res van die aanhaling uit Genesis: 'Dit is die huis van God en die poort na die hemel'. Dit is dus nie 'n vloek nie, maar 'n verklaring oor die tweeledige aard van goddelikheid. Dit is eintlik hoe die aanhaling uit We also found a lot of iconography gegraveer oor die deuropening wat nie voorheen opgemerk is nie, insluitend twee Tempelierskruise, twee Kruise van Lorraine en die Vrymesselaarsbeeld van die 'Blaasster' wat na bewering geval het van die hemel om die mensdom te verlig.

En Jakob het uit sy slaap wakker geword en gesê: Ja, Jehovah is op hierdie plek en ek het dit nie geweet nie. En hy het gevrees en gesê: Hoe verskriklik is hierdie plek! dit is niemand anders as die huis van God nie, en dit is die poort van die hemel.

Hier is 'n skakel na 'n artikel wat daarop wys dat daar 'n diepgaande verhouding kan wees tussen al hierdie plekke (selfs met verbindings met Mars): Mars, Rennes-le-Chateau en die Hall of Records

Hou ook in gedagte dat die Skotse ritueel van Vrymesselary waarskynlik direk ontstaan ​​het uit die Tempeliers wat na Rosslyn, Skotland, gevlug het en die Rosslyn -kapel gebou het. Hulle het gevlug weens die katolieke kerk.

Bogenoemde artikel van Wikipedia op Stone of Scone lui: "Dit was oorspronklik veronderstel om gebruik te word as die kroningsteen van die vroeë Dalriada -Skotte toe hulle in Ierland gewoon het. Toe hulle Caledonië binnegeval het, word gesê dat dit vir die gebruik saamgeneem is. 'N Ander teorie sê dat die klip eintlik was die reisaltaar wat deur St Columba (Illuminati Waarskuwing) in sy sendingaktiwiteite in die huidige Skotland. ”

Kan daar 'n Fenisiese/Kanaänitiese verbinding wees met die Dalriada -Skotte of die Pikte en dus met die tempel van Salomo?

Die Fenisiese koning Hiram van Tirus (989-936 vC) het 'n paleis vir Dawid en twee paleise en 'n tempel vir Salomo gebou. Die Bybel bied 'n groot hoeveelheid inligting oor hulle.

Dawid se paleis - Koning Hiram van Tirus het 'n handelsmissie na Dawid gestuur en hy het vir hom sederhoute en klipkappers en timmermanne voorsien om 'n paleis te bou. (1 Kronieke 14: 1)

Geleerdes skryf al eeue lank oor 'n ou seevarende volk wat aan moderne geskiedenisboeke bekend is as die Tuatha de Danan wat beskawings in Griekeland, Spanje, Brittanje en Ierland gestig het. Geleerdes weet nou dat die woord Tuarth 'stam' beteken. Dr Gordon het ook vasgestel dat die agtervoegsel 'AN' vroeër by eiename gevoeg is om 'n volk of gemeenskap aan te dui. Die naam van hierdie belangrike vroeë Europese koloniste moet dus vertaal word, die 'stam van Dan'. Was dit die Bybelse volk, een van die twaalf stamme van Israel?

. Gewaagde geleerdes sien die invloed van die Daniete in Ierse volksleer. en in die naam van Danmark (Denemarke): die land van Dan

Die vroeë antikvariese geleerde, Aylett Sammes, publiseer sy uitgebreide navorsing in 1676 in 'n werk getiteld THE ANTIQUITIES OF ANTIC BRITAIN DIVITED OF THE PHOENICIANS. Hy het daarop gewys (p. 58) dat die Daniete ook in die Britse geskiedenis bekend staan ​​as 'Damnonii', maar dat 'die omskakeling baie maklik en gewoonlik is, en dat dit glad nie die oorspronklike, Dan, wegsteek nie.' Die Daniete vestig hulle veral in die suidweste Brittanje se 'Feniciese' blikdistrikte, sê hy, en voeg by dat baie riviere, stede en heuwels in hierdie gebied name bevat met die stamnaam 'Dan'.

. Britannia, van die Fenisiese, 'Baratanac, 'n blikland. Metale soos tin en lood is ontgin en uitgevoer vanaf die weskus van Cornwall en die Scilly -eilande. '.

Sou u glo dat dit u is (Jesaja sê vir die 'eilande ver')? Is hulle afstammelinge van die Britse Eilande, Ierland, die lande in Noordwes -Europa, die Verenigde State en selfs Japan?

Een belangrike skakel/sleutel is die term Skithiërs (Kelte) "die mense wat in hutte woon".

Skithe (Iraniërs) en Kelte (Skotte en pikke) Is dit dieselfde?


Lees meer hieroor: Oorsprong van die foto's en Skotte

Het die profeet Jeremia ('n hoof van Iber) in Ierland gesterf?

Het hy in 583-560 vC uit Egipte gereis rondom dieselfde tyd van die verwoesting van Jerusalem, met: die skrifgeleerde Baruch, Ebed-Melech, Tea Tephi (dogter van Sedekia en erfgenaam van die troonlyn van Pharez), en die seun van die koning van Ierland wat tydens die beleg in Jerusalem was? Het Jeremia na Ierland gekom om die nasie Israel op die Eilande van die Weste te bou en om die koninklike geslag van Dawid op die troon van Israel te plant in die persoon van Sedekia se dogter, Tea Tephi? Tea Tephi is die naam van die mees gevierde koningin in die vroeë Ierse geskiedenis. Die leeu kom saam met haar in die Ierse heraldiek, 'n embleem van die Israeliete, maar veral van die stam van Juda. Met Tea Tephi het ook 'n merkwaardige klip van 400 pond na Ierland gekom wat die Lia Fail genoem word, of 'n wonderlike steen, of Stone of Scone waarop die Ierse koningslyn gekroon is tot ongeveer 500 nC. Daarna is dit na Skotland gebring en as kroningsteen gebruik daar tot 1296 nC Daarna het Edward I dit na die Westminster Abbey gebring waar dit sedertdien was, tot onlangs toe dit na Skotland teruggekeer is, as die Coronation Stone van Groot -Brittanje.

Tea Tephi trou met die Ierse monarg, Eiochaid, die Heremonn, en sluit dus by die Pharez- en Zarah -takke van Juda se koninklike lyn aan, en vanuit hulle deur die Ierse en Skotse koningslyn kan 'n mens die afkoms na George VI volg en wys dat die lyn van Davids nie verval vir Yahweh, hou sy soutverbond. (2 Kronieke 13: 5)

Was Jeremia die bejaarde witharige aartsvader, soms na verwys as 'n 'heilige', wat in Ierse tradisie in Ulster aan wal gekom het? Was Jeremia nie die oupa van koning Sedekia (laaste koning van Juda) en dus God se Trustee van die bloedlyn en die troon van Dawid nie? Uit hierdie bronne leer ons dat ongeveer 565 vC, kort nadat Jeremia en die dogters van die konings in die oostelike geskiedenis verdwyn het, daar in Tara, die setel van die Ierse konings, 'n merkwaardige en geheimsinnige persoon verskyn het, 'n profeet met die naam Ollam Fola, wat ingestel het 'n profeteskool in Ierland. Uit die aantal Hebreeuse woorde wat verband hou met hierdie geheimsinnige personasie, blyk dit dat hy 'n Hebreeuse profeet was. Die enigste Hebreeuse profeet wat verdwyn het met 'n missie wat hom na die Eilande van die Weste sou neem, was Jeremia, wie se borsbeeld in die kasteel van Dublin is. Die naam van Jeremia bly oral in hierdie dele, selfs vandag nog.

Kan 'n wyfie die bloedlyn versterk?

Het Jeremia die ou Joodse kroningsteen na Ierland gebring (was die troon dan 3 keer omgeslaan en is dit nou in Londen?)?

Is dit drie keer (uiteindelik na Engeland) verskuif ter vervulling van Esegiël se profesie wat in hoofstuk 21, verse 25-27, genoem word? Het St. Andrew na Skotland gereis? Is Israel vandag Efraim? Is Brittanje en die Verenigde State Manasse?

Volgens die legende was Ierland reeds voor die koms van Jeremia deur die Hebreërs bevolk. Lank voor 700 v.C. 'n ander sterk kolonie genaamd "Tuatha de Danaan" (stam van Dan) het in skepe aangekom, ander stamme verdryf en hulle daar gevestig. Later, in die dae van Dawid, het 'n kolonie uit die lyn van Zarah uit die Nabye Ooste in Ierland aangekom. Stel u in die lig hiervan voor hoe vrugbaar die Ierse aartappelhongersnood was. Of is al die bogenoemde 'n versinsel wat begin is deur 'n boek ("England the Remnant of Juda." London, 1861) deur die Brits-Israeliese ekspositeur met die naam eerwaarde F.R.A. Glover wat twee verskillende mense Tea en Tephi uit twee verskillende tydperke gekombineer het? Staan die wêreldwye kerk van God agter om hierdie verwarring te bevorder? Of is dit alles waar ??

The Book of Tephi, Queen of Tara and Gibraltar
Teia Tephi was die dogter (Tender Twig) van die koning van Jerusalem (die sederhout) wat Jeremia na PLANT in Ierland uitgegaan het na die uitworting en verwoesting van Sedekia, die koning van Jerusalem in ongeveer. 588 v.C.

The Book of Tephi beskryf in detail die reis wat Jeremia onderneem het met Teia Tephi, The Lia Fail (Stone of Destiny) en The Ark of the Covenant van Jerusalem na Ierland, via Tanis in Egipte (soos in "Raiders of The Lost Ark") toe na Gibraltar (waar sy uitgeroep is tot koningin van die Gaditiese Israeliete wat daar woon) Breogan in Spanje Cornwall en uiteindelik op die 18de by Howth, naby Dublin, in Ierland beland. van Junie 583 v.C.

Die boek beskryf dan baie van die belangrike gebeurtenisse wat op daardie tydstip in die geskiedenis plaasgevind het en wat verband hou met haar reis van Jerusalem na Ierland. Dit is ook vol profesieë oor baie van die belangrikste gebeurtenisse wat tussen haar en ons tyd (2 500 jaar) in die wêreld plaasgevind het, waaronder die eerste koms van Christus en die kolonisering van die wêreld deur die Britse Ryk. Die boek gee ook 'n paar baie belangrike profesieë oor die tyd waarin ons nou leef.

Miskien is die mees relevante van haar profesieë, wat die enigste is in "The Book of Tephi, queen of Tara and Gibraltar" wat nog vervul moet word, oor hierdie (ons) tyd in die geskiedenis toe sy voorspel dat sy van herstel sou word haar ondergrondse graf op The Hill of Tara, in Meath, Ierland, saam met The Ark of The Covenant, en bring weer vrede en eenheid vir die hele Ierland soos sy twee en 'n half duisend jaar gelede gedoen het en dat Christus sou uitkom van haar graf saam met haar, om as koning van die hele Ierland ingehuldig te word, op die Steen van Destiny, by Tara, en hierdie keer ook vrede en eenheid vir die hele wêreld te bring.

http://jahtruth.net/tephi.htm
Waarom is daar 'n Joodse ster/Davidster (Magen David) of Shield of David, die seël van Salomo op die Ulster Flags -simbole en embleme van Noord -Ierland?



Die Oranje Orde is 'n ander naam vir dieselfde Ulster -separatistiese beweging. Dit is 'n vrymesselaars protestantse beweging van Noord -Ierland met William van Oranje as die 'held'. Sien: die Grand Orange Lodge van Ierland vir meer.

Onthou jy die Israeliese "Oranje" opstand? Baie soortgelyk aan die Oekraïne se "Oranje Revolusie" met Viktor Joesjtsjenko as voorman.

Daar is 'n boodskap hier mense!

As ek die hele Brits-Israeliese woordfederasie aan die gang hou, vind ek al hierdie verbindings baie interessant.

Is daar 'n verband tussen hierdie geografiese liggings? Probeer hulle die verlore stamme verenig en 'n Verenigde Koninkryk van God stig? Wat is die plan hier?

Meer ondersoek is nodig!


Meer skakels: Stone of Destiny


Geskiedenis van Scones

Scone was die naam wat gegee is vir 'n Skotse brood wat met hawer gemaak is, óf op 'n rooster óf oop vuur.

Scones het begin as 'n Skotse brood. Oorspronklik gemaak met hawer en gebakte rooster, word die weergawe van vandag meer gereeld met meel gemaak en in die oond gebak.

Die oorsprong van die naam ‘scone ’ is onduidelik, met bronne wat daarop dui dat dit moontlik verband hou met die Stone (Scone) of Destiny waar Kings of Scotland gekroon is. Ander meen die naam is afgelei van die Nederlandse woord “schoonbrood ” (“schoon ” wat skoon beteken en “brood ” wat brood beteken), of van die Duitse woord “schonbrot ” wat "mooi of mooi brood" beteken #8217. Volgens Webster ’s Dictionary, het scones in die vroeë 1500's in Skotland ontstaan.

Anna, die sewende hertogin van Bedford (1788 �) word erken dat sy van scones 'n modieuse ritueel gemaak het. In 1840 voel sy 'n sinkende gevoel teen die middag, so sy beveel die bediendes om tee en soet brood, insluitend skons, saam te bring.

Sy was so bly hieroor dat sy dit elke middag bestel het en wat nou 'n Engelse tradisie geword het, is die “Afternoon Tea Time ” (presies om 16:00). Hulle word steeds daagliks bedien met die tradisionele bolletjiesroom in Brittanje.

Tye het verander. Hulle is nie meer net 'n koekie wat die Engelse met middagete bedien nie. Scones is regoor die wêreld te koop in koffiewinkels en bakkerye.

Met die uitvinding van bakpoeier word die skons die deeg wat in die oond gebak is, heeltemal anders as die ouer gaargemaakte bolletjies.
Geskiedenis van Scones


Stone of Scone

The Stone of Scone (Gaelies: Lia Fail), ook bekend as die Stone of Destiny of Coronation Stone, is 'n blok sandsteen wat verband hou met die kroning seremonies van die Middeleeuse konings van Skotland. Hierdie seremonies is gehou op Scone, 'n prehistoriese plek in Perthshire, hoewel die presiese gebruik van die klip nie bekend is nie.

In 'n doelbewuste politieke propaganda is die Stone of Scone uit Skotland verwyder deur Edward I van Engeland (r. 1272-1307), wat dit deel van die Engelse Coronation Chair in Westminster Abbey gemaak het. Die klip is uiteindelik in 1996 na Skotland terugbesorg en woon nou in die kasteel van Edinburgh.

Advertensie

Eienskappe

The Stone of Scone is 'n reghoekige plaat geel sandsteen wat waarskynlik Skots van oorsprong is, miskien uit die onderste ou rooi sandsteengesteentes in die omgewing van Perthshire. Dit meet ongeveer 66 cm x 28 cm (26 x 11 in) en weeg ongeveer 152 kg (336 pond). Die klip is effens, met die uitsondering van 'n enkele Latynse kruis. Vandag woon dit in die Crown Room van Edinburgh Castle saam met ander items van die Skotse regalia.

Mites en legendes

Vir 'n taamlik onbeskryflike plaat sandsteen, bevat die Stone of Destiny 'n merkwaardige bagasie van mite en folklore. Volgens die legende was die steen die einste wat Jakob - die voorvader van die volk Israel - as 'n kussing gebruik het toe hy in Bet -el was ('n stad noord van Jerusalem) en 'n visioen beleef het hoe engele opklim en daal van 'n hemelse leer na die hemel.

Advertensie

Die klip geniet toe 'n buitengewone mediterrane toer, waardeur dit van die Midde -Ooste na Egipte, Sicilië en Spanje beweeg het. Uiteindelik het die klip ongeveer 700 vC in Ierland aangekom, waar dit op die Hill of Tara, die neolitiese terrein in County Meath, opgerig is, waar die ou konings van Ierland geprys is. In sommige bronne was dit toe die legendariese Ierse heerser Fergus Mor wat die steen omstreeks 500 na Skotland gebring het. In 'n ander weergawe van die legende is die klip van Ierland na Skotland gebring deur prinses Scota, die dogter van 'n Egiptiese farao. Daar is ook 'n mate van verwarring of die huidige Destiny Stone dieselfde klip is as dié wat met hierdie legendes verband hou, omdat sommige vroeë Middeleeuse kroniekskrywers dit as 'n gesnede kliptroon beskryf. Alternatively, the present stone may once have been a part of this more elaborate throne.

The stone's new home in Scotland was either Dunstaffnage Castle on the western coast or, more likely given its history, the nearby island of Iona, part of the Inner Hebrides group. Iona was an ancient holy site for the Christian ascetics known as the Culdees, and it became the traditional burial ground for Scottish monarchs. Indeed, the site has a very long history with its prehistoric barrows and monuments. The stone remained at Iona for the next 350 years, and a legend grew that only where the Stone of Destiny was located would Scottish kings rule. The author Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832 CE) claimed that a piece of metal was once attached to the stone which carried the following engraved verse:

Teken in vir ons gratis weeklikse e -pos nuusbrief!

Unless the fates be faulty grown

And prophet's voice be vain

Where'er is found this sacred stone

The Scottish race shall reign.

Relocation by Kenneth MacAlpin

The Celtic king Kenneth MacAlpin (also spelt Cinaed mac Ailpin or mac Ailpein, r. c. 842-858) ruled the Kingdom of the Scots or Alba as it is sometimes known. Kenneth is credited with taking the Stone of Destiny to Scone in Perthshire around 843, perhaps as a symbol of his subjugation of the Picts who may have used the stone for their own coronation ceremonies. It was used in the ceremonies held at Scone to inaugurate Scottish kings thereafter. Lords and bishops gathered at Scone, and later at Scone Abbey, to witness their king being acclaimed and to swear oaths of loyalty. The king's long genealogy was also proclaimed to the gathered dignitaries. Scottish kings were, as yet, not crowned or anointed with holy oil - this form of coronation ceremony would only take place from the 14th century onwards. The king did not perhaps sit on the stone either but, rather, it was used as an altar during the ceremony and set upon the small artificial mound known as Moot Hill or the 'Hill of Belief'. Alternatively, the stone may have been used in different ways over the centuries as, in a detailed description of the ceremony of Alexander III of Scotland (r. 1249-1286), it is stated by John of Fordun that Alexander did sit on the stone.

If the king was married, then the queen received her inauguration service after her husband. By the 12th century, Scottish kings were given familiar symbols of power such as a sword, sceptre, rod, and orb. In addition, the ancient sacred site of Scone was given its own monastery c. 1115 by Alexander I of Scotland (r. 1107-1124). The monastery, first a priory and then, later, a full abbey, was founded by Augustinian canons from Nostel Abbey in Yorkshire.

Advertensie

Removal By Edward I

The Stone of Scone's destiny was about to be changed by an Englishman, one of Scotland's greatest ever enemies. Edward I of England adjudicated over who became the successor of Alexander III of Scotland, an event often termed as the Great Cause. Top candidates were the powerful nobleman John Balliol and Robert Bruce (b. 1210 and grandfather of his more famous namesake). In 1292, Edward plumbed for Balliol, perhaps because he was the weaker of the two and so could be more easily manipulated. John was to be the last medieval Scottish king to be crowned on or near the Stone of Scone on 30 November 1292. As it turned out, the Scots themselves grew tired of Balliol's ineffective responses to Edward's domination, and open rebellion was in the air. In 1295 Scotland formally allied itself with France - the first move in what became known as the 'Auld Alliance' - a step too far for the English king.

Edward I then invaded Scotland, personally leading an army of 25,000-30,000 men. The king thus earned his nickname as 'the Hammer of the Scots', and he was intent on total conquest. Balliol surrendered after the Battle of Dunbar in 1296, and three English barons were nominated to rule Scotland. Always with an eye for dramatic gestures regarding enemy cultures, Edward stole the Scottish monarchy's regalia and the Stone of Scone, relocating it to Westminster Abbey in 1297. There it was placed under the seat of the purpose-built English Coronation Chair, often called St. Edward's Chair because Edward I dedicated his prize to the English king and saint, Edward the Confessor (r. 1042-1066). In this act of removal, Edward I was effectively declaring that Scotland was no longer a kingdom but a mere province of England.

There was a legend that the wily Scots had given Edward a substitute stone and kept the real one safe on the Isle of Skye, but the truth of that is unlikely ever to be substantiated, and there is no evidence that Edward did not get his hands on the original. In any case, Scotland was never quite subdued, and more rebellions followed, notably the 1300 uprising led by William Wallace (c. 1270-1305). Edward II of England may have been prepared to return the stone (r. 1307-1327) as part of a peace treaty with Scotland agreed in 1328. However, it seems that the Abbot of Westminster Abbey refused to give it up. Consequently, the Stone of Scone remained in England for the next seven centuries. On 25 March 1306, Robert the Bruce (r. 1306-1329) was the first Scottish king to be crowned without the stone, although the ceremony was held as usual in Scone Abbey.

Advertensie

Later History & Return to Scotland

As fate would have it, a Scottish king did eventually get to be crowned while sitting on the Stone of Scone. This was James VI of Scotland (r. 1567-1625) who also became James I of England CE (r. 1603-1625) when he was crowned in Westminster Abbey in 1603. This happened because his predecessor Elizabeth I of England (r. 1558-1603) had died without children, and James, Elizabeth's closest relative, was invited by the nobles of England to take the throne. James was of the Stuart line, and that house would rule England until 1714, all of its monarchs taking their place above the Stone of Scone in their coronation. The Scots had finally turned the tables on the English after Edward I's theft 300 years earlier, and the legend of the stone had proved correct: a Scottish king now ruled where the stone resided.

From the 19th century, the Stone of Scone became a potent national symbol for the Scots, and there were repeated calls for the stone's return. In 1950 a group of Scottish nationalists managed to break into Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day of all days. They grabbed the stone and took it back to Scotland, but it was recovered by the authorities and returned to Westminster four months later. The stone was finally and this time officially returned to the people of Scotland in 1996, appropriately enough, on 30 November, Saint Andrew's Day, which honours the patron saint of Scotland. There was one catch which illustrates the continuing power of the stone in the imaginations of the peoples on both sides of the border: the stone must be returned to Westminster Abbey on the occasion of a coronation ceremony of a British monarch.


The Stone of Destiny and the end of the New World Order


Recently, a man named Anthony John Hill was arrested and is now being corruptly and forcefully extradited to nazi-London where He will stand trial for the heinous crime of: sending a DVD to a courthouse. Ja. Really.

Think I'm kidding? I wish but the insanity doesn't stop there.

As with ALL governments, the British establishment has a long, extensive, and documented history of silencing and imprisoning people who had damaging information to the State's (evil) interests. Mr. Hill is their next target because of what He knows and what He is telling people and how irrefutably damaging it is to the corruption at the top. First they tried to stone-wall Him, and when people were too hungry for His knowledge, THEY (the slime in ALL high positions) decided it would be best to arrest Him in order to try and force His silence. Obviously that didn't work, as His video, about what really happened with the London tube-train bombings, called " 7/7 Ripple Effect ", has had a huge upswing in interest. If you have not seen it, you really need to, and like the good soul He is, John has had it put up on the internet for free-viewing and you can watch it here.

And that's just the very latest!

Please read the following very-well-hidden story/Truth that John has also dug up regarding the British monarch, headed by Elizabeth Mountbatten/Battenberg (also known by criminal aliases Windsor and QE2). I'll spoil it for you. She is NOT the real queen, and has been faking it for over 50 years, AND SHE KNOWS IT.

The Stone of Destiny and the end of the New World Order

(Also known as: The Lia Fail, Stone of Scone, Jacob's Pillar/Pillow, David's Throne, Bethel Stone, etc")

Few people outside of Britain and Ireland have ever heard of The Stone of Destiny let alone the amazing 4,000 year history behind it. Even smaller numbers have ever stumbled across the Truth of the real Stone's current state or location and why the covered-up facts and fake stones floating around are of such great importance in the now very near future. The ramifications of acting on this information could and will be astounding if people do so in mass..

Due to the fact that the full-length article on this topic is freely available for anyone that wants to get into the exacting details, this write-up will offer only a very brief summary of events. That said, this author very much advises anyone interested in this topic to visit the website where all the following is sourced from: http://jahtruth.net/stone.htm .


The Stone of Destiny:

The story begins in the land of Palestine at a place called Bethel with the Biblical patriarch Jacob (Genesis 28:11-22). Die authentic Stone of Destiny is the stone/rock that Jacob used as a pillow when he dreamed of angels ascending and descending on a ladder between Heaven and Earth . When awaking from that dream, Jacob made a vow of allegiance to God and then took the stone he had used as a pillow and anointed it with oil as it would be from then on used as the throne that every subsequent God-sanctioned ruler of Israel would be crowned and sit upon. At that point it became the Throne of Israel, being kept and fiercely protected by all of Jacob's heirs for thousands of years to come.

Flashing forward about 1,100 years after Jacob originally had his dream in a cave near Bethel, the Stone had made its way through all of Israel's times of turmoil and Zedekiah was ruling upon it in Jerusalem. At that point, because of the obstinate ways of the Israelites and their refusal to keep The Covenant , God sent the Babylonian forces to attack and destroy the House of Judah (Israel) and leave all of Jerusalem in ruins. During this siege and conquering, Jeremiah the Bible Prophet hid The Stone, along with The Ark of The Covenant and other Israelite relics until it was safe to whisk them away to safety. With these treasures in possession, Jeremiah also brought with him Zedekiah's daughters, the youngest of which was Teia Tephi , who would be the continuation of the bloodline as God promised to king David centuries prior.

When escaping from Jerusalem, the royal party took The Stone and Ark and traveled to Tanis, Egypt where they stayed safely for a few years. Eventually, Jeremiah was warned by God that Tanis was no longer safe so he took Teia Tephi and the treasures towards Gibraltar , making brief stops along the way. After spending five months in Gibraltar, the group set off northward, stopping at Breogan in Spain and then eventually landing at Mara-Zion in Cornwall.

At that point, the ruler of Cornwall at the time was a man named Elatha who helped Jeremiah and Teia Tephi towards what would be their final destination - Ierland . Elatha sent messengers to the high king (Ard ri) of Ireland, notifying him of the situation and then a guard of 53 ships to ensure safe passage for Tephi and Jeremiah. Upon arrival, Tephi took The Stone with her to Tara where she and the high king, Eochaidh, gave their pledges of marriage over the Stone of Destiny, and Teia Tephi stood upon the Stone and was acknowledged queen of all Ireland.

Presently, in Ireland at the Hill of Tara , is one of the fake stones. It is an obscene phallic stone that foolish people have and are trying to pass off as the real Lia Fail (Gaelic for Stone of Destiny). Calling a phallic stone the Throne of Israel (and Christ) is like telling Christ to come and sit on a stone penis which has caused the Irish to be cursed by God for such an insult. However, that is only one of the fake "Lia Fail" stones presently in existence.

The real Lia Fail/Stone of Destiny stayed in Ireland at the Hill of Tara for over a thousand years after Teia Tephi brought it with her from Jerusalem in 583 B.C. and all the kings of Ireland were crowned on that werklike Stone, right up to Muircheartach (Murdoch) son of Earc.

In around 500 A.D. Fergus Mor Mac Earc, Muircheartach's brother successfully invaded western Scotland and wanted to be crowned king of the (Scots) Irish who had migrated to Skotland on the werklike Stone of Destiny and his brother Muircheartach loaned the real Stone to him for that occasion.

Fergus was crowned first king of the Scots in Scotland upon the werklike Lia Fail in a region called Argyll in the Kilmartin valley of Scotland. From him proceeded forty kings of Scotland. The twelfth king, Evenus built a town which he named after himself called Evonium, now called Dunstaffnage, to which the werklike Stone was removed and the remainder of the forty kings were all crowned in Dunstaffnage, reigned there, and are buried there.

Eventually, Edward the 1 st of England (Edward "Longshanks" in the film Braveheart) invaded Scotland and removed the werklike Stone to England in 1296 A.D. where he brought it to Westminster Abbey in London and all the kings of England right up to and including George the 6 ste were crowned on that werklike Stone of Destiny/Lia Fail.

Some Scots have always maintained that a fake Stone was handed over to Edward "Longshanks" by the Abbot of Scone, as he must have known in advance that Edward's soldiers were coming to take the Stone from the Scots. To make that long story much shorter, the ancient writings depict the other stone in question as looking different in shape and colour. Also, the werklike Stone of Destiny's path to Scotland, and the history of the fake, or other coronation stone/throne known as the Scottish Regal Stone, do not match up, as they came at two different times, being brought by two different people by similar but nevertheless two different routes, which many historians have tried to lump together and which, like a square peg and a round hole, the facts of both do not fit together. This has caused great confusion for the average person looking into the topic because both are similar in content, although the fact remains that they are two totally separate stories about two separate stones that were simply used for the same purpose by two separate branches of the same people and historians have mistakenly tried to jumble up both into one story. Die werklike stone was taken by Edward to Westminster Abbey.

At this point it would be prudent to introduce the Biblical prophecy , located in the book of Ezekiel , about the movement of the true Stone of Destiny:

21:26 Thus saith the Lord "I AM" Remove the diadem (sovereignty), and take off the crown: this [shall] not [be] the same: exalt [him that is] low (Line of Zarah), and abase [him that is] high (Line of Pharez).
21:27 I will overturn (1), overturn (2), overturn (3), it: and it shall be no [more], [overturned] UNTIL he come whose Right it is and (4) Ek will give it [him - Shiloh (see also Genesis 49 v 10)].

The first overturn of the Stone was from Jerusalem to Ireland. The second overturn was from Ireland to Scotland. The third overturn was from Scotland to England. The fourth overturn is as follows.

Early Christmas morning, 1950, a group of four student-aged Scottish nationals, removed the werklike Stone of Destiny/Lia Fail from Westminster Abbey and hurried it off to Scotland. The leader of the group, Ian Hamilton, states in his book, "The Taking of the Stone of Destiny", that king George 6 th had a "fear that the loss portended the end of his dynasty ", which of course it did. This removal of the authentic Stone of Destiny justly caused a big stir in England and the authorities immediately began searching for it.

In preparation for the Stone's removal from London, the group of Scots practiced using a fake sandstone replica made by stone mason and sculptor, Bertie Gray. Then, after successfully removing the werklike Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey, Bertie Gray helped Ian Hamilton and another friend of theirs to place the fake sandstone duplicate, wrapped in a Scottish flag, on the high altar at Arbroath Abbey on the 11 th of April, 1951. They then notified the authorities that it could be found there, which they did the following day. The fake sandstone replica was then sent to London and Elizabeth 2 was later crowned upon it. Since Elizabeth 2 has never been crowned upon the werklike Stone of Destiny/Coronation Stone, she has never been and is not officially the queen of Brittanje (Israel) in the eyes of God.

When the fake stone was sent to London, George 6 th must have seen it and known, as must his daughter Elizabeth, that the stone left at Arbroath Abbey was a fake, and Elizabeth must have known, from that, that she was cursed by God and never regtig crowned. As further proof that Elizabeth knows she is a fake, once her dad George 6 th died, Elizabeth Mountbatten (also known by the criminal aliases Windsor and QE2) delayed her coronation whilst desperately seeking and hoping to find the genuine Coronation Stone, but, when it was not found and she had to hold a coronation ceremony, she flatly refused to have the ceremony televised because she was afraid that people would see the fake stone, recognize it as being such, and realize she was a pretender to the Throne. Due to popular-demand, Mrs. Mountbatten was forced to allow the ceremony to be televised, so she set a firm condition upon the BBC that there must be absolutely no close-up shots, and nothing shown at a closer distance than thirty feet, so that no-one would be able to see a close-up of the fake stone that she knew she was pretending to be crowned upon. She must also have known of the prophecies, as did her great, great grandmother Queen Victoria, who said that if Christ came to take the Throne, she would immediately step down and give the throne it to its rightful owner, and everyone of them knew it down to George 6 th . It is unthinkable that George 6 th would not also have taught this to his children, that Christ would come one day and rightfully claim the British Throne (Throne of David and Israel), in fulfillment of prophecy.

Elizabeth 2 who is descended from the royal line of David from the tribe of Judah was then crowned on the fake stone in 1953, so, as above, she has never been crowned queen of Britain in the eyes of God as God Himself prevented her from being, by having the Stone taken from her in fulfillment of the first half of the prophecy in Genesis chapter 49:10. All that now remains to fulfill the second half of that prophecy is for Christ to come and take His Rightful place on God's Throne "&ldquo Bethel "&ldquo The Lia Fail "&ldquo Stone of Destiny.

Elizabeth has absolutely no right to be the monarch, and she knew it to begin with and surely remains well aware of the situation-and it can be proven with the aforementioned indisputable and bulletproof evidence.

Hopefully everyone reading this article will realize how serious a matter this is as the fake British monarch is at the very top of the entire N.W.O. beast-system , according to ex-MI6 agent Dr. John Coleman in his book: "The Conspirators' Hierarchy", "The Committee of 300". Taking down "queen" Elizabeth and the whole house of Windsor would be a huge victory for the good guy and a giant start and step towards destroying the entire satanic New World Order.

All that presently needs doing is informing people of the situation and asking them to make a lot of noise about it. The NWO thugs made a gigantic mistake in letting this information get out, and if taken advantage of, the resulting waves that could be made across the entire world would be immense. This is big news that must go viral. Please do your part in passing it on to everyone you know.

Study the information yourself and pass it as far and wide as possible so that we can start taking down the New World Order and reverse all the immense damage and suffering that it has caused.


What is the Stone of Scone? - GESKIEDENIS

CAPSULE REPORT: The history of the scone and its companion, clotted cream. This is Page 1 of a two-page article. Click on the black links below to visit Page 2.

Scone History

Scones are traditionally connected with Scotland, Ireland and England, but exactly who deserves the honor of invention, no one knows for sure. Scones may well have originated in Scotland. The first known print reference, in 1513, is from a Scottish poet. However, in earlier eras, when communications were more limited, the creation of an actual item can have predated the first appearance of printed references by many years. Centuries ago, there weren&rsquot newspapers that reported on the minutiae of life the way ours do. There were no food columns in the local papers proclaiming that &ldquoMcTavish Bakery has created a new griddle-fried oatcake called a scone&mdashnow available at 3 Sheepshead Lane.&rdquo In fact, there were few newspapers. Much of the population was not literate. So, culinary historians rely on cookbooks and mentions in literature and other printed records. Given the perishability of these items, it is logical to think that many first-printed mentions of foods and other items may not have survived.

Scones are related to the ancient Welsh tradition of cooking small round yeast cakes (leavened breads) on bakestones, and later on griddles. One claim, probably not the best, says that scones are named for the Stone (scone) of Destiny, a stone upon which Scottish kings once sat when they were crowned (the Abbey of Scone can still be found, upriver from Perth but the Stone of Destiny was long ago removed to Westminster Abbey). Other contenders include the Gaelic &ldquosgonn&rdquo (rhymes with gone), a shapeless mass or large mouthful the Dutch &ldquoschoonbrot,&rdquo fine white bread and the closely-related German &ldquosconbrot,&rdquo fine or beautiful bread. The Oxford English Dictionary favors the latter two.

Originally, scones were made with oats, shaped into a large round, scored into four or six wedges (triangles) and griddle-baked over an open fire (later, a stovetop). With the advent of oven baking, the round of dough was cut into wedges and the scones were baked individually.

Today&rsquos scones are quick breads, similar to American biscuits. They are traditionally made with wheat flour, sugar, baking powder or baking soda, butter, milk and eggs, and baked in the oven&mdashboth in the traditional wedge form and in round, square and diamond shapes. This recipe produces a hard, dry texture.

Traditional English scones may include raisins or currants, but are often plain, relying on jam, preserves, lemon curd or honey for added flavor&mdashperhaps with a touch of clotted cream (see definition below). Fancy scones&mdashwith dried fruit such as cranberries and dates, nuts, orange rind, chocolate morsels and other flavorings&mdashare best enjoyed without butter and jam.

You may have heard two different pronunciations for &ldquoscone.&rdquo Which is the authentic one? They both are! The word is pronounced &ldquoskahn&rdquo in Scotland and Northern England (rhymes with gone) and &ldquoskoan&rdquo in the south of England (rhymes with own), the pronunciation adopted by the U.S. and Canada.

Lifestyle Direct, Inc. All rights reserved. Photographs are the copyright of their respective owners.

© Copyright 2005-2021 Lifestyle Direct, Inc. All rights reserved. All images are copyrighted to their respective owners.


mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_170,h_234,al_c,q_80,blur_3/170px-Coronation_Chair_and_Stone_of_Scon.jpg" />

mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_116,h_69,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2/stone%201.jpg" />

mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_116,h_76,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2/stone%203.jpg" />

mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_164,h_123,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2/CORONATIONS%2BAT%2BSCONE%2BIt%2Bwas%2Ba%2Btradition%2B.jpg" />

The Stone of Scone was captured by Edward the 1st in 1296 as spoils of war, It was then taken to England and place in a wooden chair in Westminster Abbey in London, known as King Edwards Chair . Most of the English then British Kings and Queens have been crowned on King Edwards Chair.

Edward 1 had wanted to claim the status of &ldquoLord Paramount&rdquo of Scotland with the right to overseer the Scottish King.

There is some doubt to the story of the capture of the Stone as it has been said that the Monks at the Place of Scone hid the real stone in the River Tay or buried it on Dunsinane Hill and that the English troops were tricked into taking a fake stone.

There has also been claims that the historic description of the stone does not match the present stone.

In 1328 In the Northampton Treaty between the then Kingdom of Scotland and the Kingdom of England, saw England agree to return the Stone of Scone back to Scotland, However crowds gathered to prevent the stones removal from Westminster Abbey. The stone remained in England for another 6 centuries, even after James V1 of Scotland assumed the English Throne and became King James 1 of England.

For the next hundred years the Stuart Kings and Queen sat on the stone but it was at their coronation as the King or Queen of England. In 1950 four Scottish Student, Ian Hamilton,Gavin Vernon,Kay Matherson and Alan Stuart removed the Stone of scone from Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day to return it back to Scotland. However during it removal the stone broke into two pieces , They buried the larger piece in a field in Kent where they had been camping for a few days, They uncovered the buried stone and returned to Scotland along with a new accomplice whose name was John Josselyn.

According to one US diplomat who had been posted in Edinburgh at the time, the stone had been hidden for a short time in a trunk in the basement of the Consulate's Public Affairs Officer, unknown to him, before it was removed. Although English, John Josselyn, who was then a student of the University of Glasgow, was a Scottish Nationalist Edward I was John Josselyn's 21st great-grandfather. The smaller piece was brought north at a later time. The entire stone was passed to a senior Glasgow politician, who arranged for it to be professionally repaired by Glasgow stonemason Robert Gray.

The British Government ordered an extensive search for the stone but it proved to be unsuccessful. The stone once repaired was said to be placed on the altar of Arbroath Abbey on the 11th April 1951 in the safe-keeping of the Church of Scotland.

The London police were informed of its whereabouts, and the stone was then returned to Westminster four months after it had been removed. Afterwards, rumours circulated that copies had been made of the stone, and that the returned stone was not the original.

In 1996, in a symbolic response to growing dissatisfaction among Scots at the prevailing constitutional settlement, the British Government decided that the stone should be kept in Scotland when not in use at coronations. On 3 July 1996, it was announced in the House of Commons that the stone would be returned to Scotland, and on 15 November 1996, after a handover ceremony at the border between representatives of the Home Office and of the Scottish Office, it was transported to Edinburgh Castle. The stone arrived in the Castle on 30 November 1996, St Andrew's Day, where the official handover ceremony occurred. Prince Andrew, Duke of York, representing Queen Elizabeth II, formally handed over the Royal Warrant transferring the stone into the safekeeping of the Commissioners for the Regalia. It currently remains alongside the crown jewels of Scotland, the Honours of Scotland, in the Crown Room.


Scottish nationalists stole the Stone

On December 25, 1950, Scottish Nationalists are said to have stolen the Stone of Scone. However, in April the following year, authorities recovered it and safely deposited it a vault. Since then the coronation chair and the stone existed separately.

The coronation chair without the stone of scone. (Kjetil Bjørnsrud / Wikimedia Commons)


From the archive, 4 July 1996: Stone of Scone going home after 700 years

John Major delighted patriotic Scots but astonished the political establishment at Westminster yesterday by unexpectedly announcing that the ancient Stone of Scone is to be returned to Scotland 700 years after it was seized by the marauding English.

The Prime Minister’s announcement, which ministers insisted was not a political gesture towards Scottish nationalism, means that the “Stone of Destiny” - the historic symbol of Scotland’s monarchs until Edward I brought it to Westminster Abbey in 1296 - will be rehoused later this year, probably in Edinburgh Castle or nearby St Giles’ Cathedral.

Downing Street was quick to quell speculation that Mr Major’s gesture would renew pressure on Britain to hand back other cultural icons seized during its imperial heyday, notably the Elgin Marbles. The stone is the property of the Queen and is simply being removed from one part of her kingdom to another, the Scottish Secretary, Michael Forsyth, confirmed.

Ministers also tried to squash the instant revival of another legend, that the stone, which was stolen by nationalists - stolen back, they would say - in 1950, was not returned to its place below the Coronation Chair in 1952 - the year before the Queen became the latest monarch to be crowned above it.

A fake was substituted and the real stone is still in Scotland, former Labour frontbencher, John McAllion, and others said. Ministers insisted it was authenticated in 1951 and promised to publish the papers which prove it.

Since Jacob’s pillow - as it is supposed to be - reached the now-ruined Scone Abbey in 846 via Egypt, Spain and Ireland’s sacred hill at Tara, mere paperwork is unlikely to prove anything conclusively. By comparison Mel Gibson’s Oscar-winning blockbuster Braveheart - in which Edward I is cast as the villain - is a model of accuracy.

Mr Forsyth, who initiated yesterday’s decision, repeatedly stressed: “I do not regard this as a political gesture,” which is why Mr Major had resisted the temptation to save yesterday’s Commons statement for his appearance at the Scottish grand committee in Dumfries tomorrow. Instead he stressed the stone’s religious symbolism.

Mr Forsyth’s claim is one which few will believe of such a wily politician. He has been working to boost Scottish political self-esteem through a series of symbolic moves, including tomorrow’s committee session in Dumfries. Many MPs see the decision as chiefly symbolic of the Tories’ 15% share in Scottish opinion polls.

Tony Blair and the former Liberal leader, Sir David Steel, welcomed the decision as proof that Britain’s “distinct and proud nations” can celebrate unity and diversity - a hint at devolution battles ahead.

“I hope you recognise it is the settled view of the majority of people in Scotland that they want not just the symbol, but the substance of the return of democratic control over our internal affairs in Scotland,” said Sir David.

Angry Labour backbenchers and the SNP MP, Margaret Ewing, were much more blunt. Mrs Ewing complained that the “stolen goods” were supposed to have been returned under the terms of the Treaty of Northampton in 1328 - but were retained by the Abbey. A return of full sovereignty would not be delayed so long, she predicted.

With some Labour MPs dismissing the stone as an irrelevant symbol of “feudal medieval tyranny”, Andrew Faulds even questioned Mr Major’s claim that Scotland’s crown jewels - to be displayed with the stone - are Europe’s oldest. Hungary’s are older, he claimed.

Mr Forsyth, who has spent the past year hammering Labour’s “tartan tax”, called his initiative “a confident act of celebration of our United Kingdom and the Union of the Crowns”. Ministers stress the stone will be returned to Westminster for the coronation of the next monarch, assuming there is one, and that England and Scotland are still on speaking terms.


The Legend Of The Stone Of Destiny

According to legend, it was the biblical Jacob’s pillow. It was taken to Scythia, by Scota. She was the daughter of a Pharoah. No, really.

She married and her descendants became Kings of Spain. One of them carried the stone to Ireland then an early king of Scotland took it over to Argyll.

Next, the missionary Columba got hold of it after he came to the island of Iona in 563AD. (You may surmise here I have cut a long story short. You have to do this with anything relating to the Stone of Destiny.)

Thanks for keeping up. Right, a few problems here: this legend only dates from the start of the 14th century.

Utterly unconvincing and miserable looking Stone of Scone lookalike, in Scone Palace grounds.

Persuading Pope Boniface…

It was invented as a story for Pope Boniface (love the name) in order to prove the Scots were much older than the English and therefore should be independent from them.

(In those days supportive economic data was harder to come by.)

There are other early references but let’s focus on a moment in time here. (Cue kind of trembly and tense violin music or out-of-tune bagpipe wailing. Whatever works best for you.)

That day at the Abbey at Scone…

Gasp! Help ma boab! (And other expressions signifying Scottish incredulity.) News has arrived for the monks at the Abbey at Scone, custodians of the Stone of Destiny.

King Edward of (gasp again!) England is on his way!

The monks know that this (probably ornately carved) stone is important and has already been graced by the solemn rear-ends of a line of Scottish kings.

But by 1296, King Edward of England has had enough of the uppity Scots and wants to crush them forever. Or, worse still, make them like the English.

The conversation in the monastery goes like this:

Brother Hamish: ‘WTF. We’ve got tae dae something… He’s gonnae murder us. Or mak us speak using vowels with diphthongs. Ah cannae stand thae diphthongs.’

Brother Jimmy: ‘Hang on a minute. This Edward guy. He disnae ken whit the stane looks like. We could hide the stane and pit anither ane in its place, no?’

Brother Hamish: ‘See you, Jimmy? Yerra genius.’

(Roughly translating: the two clever monks have decided to hide the original stone and substitute another one. King Edward doesn’t actually know what the stone looks like.)

And so they did. By good luck, a local builder was in fitting a new kitchen in the refectory at the time. Aha, building material at hand. No time to lose. The monks did a swap.

They took a chunk of the local sandstone, a bit rough and ready, and somehow convinced King Edward of England’s courier that it was (snigger!) the real Stone of Destiny.

He said something like: ‘Rai-eet-ow, mite. Stown of Destiny, aa-eeh? Give us an ‘and wiv it. Naa-oo, soign ‘ere on the dotted loin.

(Couriers from England, eh? Never make out a word they say.)

The wily monks have pulled it off!

Anyway, he heaved it into his van and took it to Westminster, London, England. Everyone was happy. The two monks did a high five, or ‘altus quintus’ as they called it in Latin.

Nobody minded down in Edward’s court that the dimensions of the stone were a bit odd for sitting on.

There were no carvings, nor carrying hooks, nor any of the details seen in the 12th-century seals of the Scottish kings and also illustrated in contemporary coinage.

These show the kings seated on some larger stone object, high enough for them to be seated on in the first place. The carried-off Stone of Destiny is only 10.75 inches (27cm high.) Och, details, details…and what a gullible lot they must have been.

Die werklike Stone of Destiny – hidden in secret

Something else was done that day in 1296. The monks not only substituted a stone – they had to hide the real stone, of course. A potent symbol of Scotland in a top secret hiding place – so top secret that, known only to a few, eventually the Stone of Destiny was lost. Forgotten.

Fast forward. The nation of Scotland later was sold off by the hard-up Scottish aristocracy and had been in a union with England since 1707.

But here is the interesting bit. A real ‘what if’…….now listen up.

What Happened To The Real Stone Of Destiny

In 1818, a certain Mr Nairne of Dunsinane House, near Scone, followed up on a story he had heard from two local men.

Some years before, when just young boys working on a local farm, they said that they went exploring a recent landslip on Dunsinane Hill, around the site of an ancient hill fort, known as Macbeth’s Castle.

They found a fissure – a hidden cave. Inside it was a black stone, mysteriously carved.

Nairne was interested, assembled a team of diggers and investigated. Their diggings eventually revealed this location once again.

The Real Stone of Scone – found!

They found not just the stone as described by the farm lads but also two round tablets with insignia – similar perhaps to the plaque-like objects seen illustrated in the Great Seals of Kings Malcolm V, Alexander I and David I.

According to newspaper accounts of the time ‘the curious stone has been shipped to London for the inspection of the scientific amateur, in order to discover its real qualities.’

Well, you’d expect that wouldn’t you? The Scots couldn’t be trusted to draw the right conclusions perhaps, especially as a backward northern province of ‘North Britain’.

The real stone vanishes

Oddly enough, that stone has not been seen since. Apparently it was not only black but semi-metallic in appearance, as if it was meteoric in origin.

It is known that this type of ‘heaven-sent’ rock has significance for ancient peoples all over the world.

‘Declaration of Arbroath’ statue, Arbroath. Declaration wording also available as souvenir tea-towel. On the Moot Hill, Scone, scene of the crowning of Scotland’s monarchs

Here’s an intriguing note though…

This email came my way recently…

Hello Gilbert,
Regarding the stone of Scone, I remember some years ago in the Readers Digest was an article entitled “Mysteries of the British Museum”.

In it a black meteorite like stone with designed metal plates attached to it was in their basement as uncategorised.

I am sure this is the real stone. I contacted Mr McKerracher at the time but have been unable to proceeding any further.

(Pictured here) The Moot Hill in the grounds of Scone Palace, where the Kings of Scotland were crowned sitting on the Stone of Destiny.

A replica stone is on the site today. (Pictured at top of page.)

Also in the picture here, a (white) peacock shelters from at the base of the tree, hunched and miserable (as were we) because it was raining. The deer in the picture don’t mind the rain as they are made of plaited willow.

It was late in the afternoon and things were getting a bit surreal……

What happened to the Stone of Scone next?

Later still, the so-called Stone of Destiny or Coronation Stone, the one stolen by Edward of England lived under the throne in Westminster Abbey, London, England. There it was damaged by suffragette attack in 1914.

Then, in 1950 it was removed by a group of four Scottish students – nationalistically motivated, the rascals! It broke in two. Tee-hee.

It was subsequently repaired and left in Arbroath Abbey, in Angus.

Declaration of Arbroath

This coastal town is associated with the Scots’ ‘Letter of Arbroath’ or ‘Declaration of Arbroath’ (1320), justifying their right to be a free nation.

This was part of a wider diplomatic campaign to get the English off their backs and the document, in Latin, was an appeal to Pope John XXII.

It was subsequently repaired and left in Arbroath Abbey, which, of course, is associated with the Scots’ ‘Letter of Arbroath’ or ‘Declaration of Arbroath’ (1320), justifying their right to be a free nation.

Pictured above is a modern statue commemorating the signing of the Declaration of Arbroath. (Also available as a souvenir tea-towel.) Also pictured is Arbroath Abbey. (Excellent visitor centre here.)

The Abbey here gave its name to the Declaration of Arbroath a letter or appeal signed by the great and good in 1320 and asking Pope John XXII to get the English off their backs (roughly speaking).

The Real Stone Of Destiny?

Back in 1950, rumours circulated that copies of the stone had been made – but in any case a stone or the stone was returned to Westminster Abbey.

There it sat until the obviously pro-Unionist Westminster government returned it to Scotland in 1996. (Nope, personally, I never did quite understand why.)

Probably it was a case of ‘Oh, give them their stone back. That’ll shut them up’. Anyway, it wasn’t enough to settle anything down in Scottish politics.

The current deal is that the Stone of Destiny, Stone of Scone, Coronation Stone, or whatever it is called, goes back to Westminster if needed for a coronation. Whatever.

Right now, you can see a stone of some kind of destiny in Edinburgh Castle. And you can decide for yourself which stone it is.

At some point you’ll see it in a new development right in the middle of Perth, quite close to Scone. Will keep you posted. Promise.

But aren’t legends and enduring mysteries such fun?

More on the Stone of Destiny (or Scone)

If you want to read a whole lot more detail about this, then get yourself a copy of The Scots Magazine of December 1984. In there you will find a fascinating and authoritative article by the historian A.C McKerracher all about the mystery of the stone.

Still in the mood for Scottish history? (What’s wrong with you?) Take a look at a list of our Scottish monarchs, many of whom might have been the life and soul at banquets.

Or learn more about the Highland Clearances, which were not at all funny.

Check out accommodation in Perth. Scone Palace is just a short drive away.